Fentanyl with Midazolam as an Adjuvant to Intrathecal Bupivacaine in Lower Limb Surgeries

  • Sunil Kuldeep SMS Medical College and Hospitals, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India
  • Malkhan Singh SMS Medical College and Hospitals, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India
  • Sunil Chauhan SMS Medical College and Hospitals, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India
  • Siddharth Sharma SMS Medical College and Hospitals, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India
Keywords: Adjuvant,, Analgesia, Fentanyl, Intrathecal, Midazolam, Prolonged

Abstract

Introduction: Coadministration of drugs with synergistic effects considered one of the methods to increase the effectiveness of analgesia. The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of midazolam to potentiate the analgesic effect of fentanyl as an adjuvant to bupivacaine.
Materials and Methods: This is a hospital based prospective, randomized, double-blind interventional control study conducted at SMS medical college and hospitals, Jaipur. A total of 90 patients were enrolled in the study. They were allocated into three groups, 30 in each. A total of 3.7 ml study drugs injected in each group. Intraoperative monitoring of hemodynamic parameters, duration of surgery, onset of sensory and motor block, duration of analgesia, sensory and motor block, and incidence of adverse effects was done and compared.
Results: There was no significant difference in mean pulse rate, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, and mean arterial pressure (P > 0.05). The mean duration of surgery in Group A, B, and C was 101.3 ± 13.08, 92.93 ± 15.28, and 95.93 ± 16.03 min, respectively (P > 0.05). The mean onset time of sensory block in Group A was 7.29 ± 1.23, in B 4.92 ± 0.60, and in C 4.79 ± 0.91 min (P < 0.05). The mean onset time of motor block in Group A was 8.75 ± 0.55, in B 7.79 ± 0.42, and in C 7.57 ± 0.29 min. In Group A, mean time of sensory block was 194.4 ± 6.80, in B 236.60 ± 12.79, and in C 254.30 ± 7.32 min. In Group A, mean duration of motor block was 180.2 ± 5.22, in B 188.7 ± 4.04 and in C 199.6±6.69 min. In Group A, mean duration of analgesia was 215.7 ± 14.6, in B 445.8 ± 18.92, and in C 522.3 ± 16.33 min. The incidence of adverse effects was insignificant.
Conclusion: We conclude that midazolam potentiates the effect of fentanyl in terms of prolonged duration of analgesia and prolonged motor and sensory block when used as an adjuvant of bupivacaine without any significant hemodynamic compromise.

Author Biographies

Sunil Kuldeep, SMS Medical College and Hospitals, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India

Junior Resident, Department of Anaesthesia

Malkhan Singh, SMS Medical College and Hospitals, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India

Senior Resident, Department of Anaesthesia

Sunil Chauhan, SMS Medical College and Hospitals, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India

Senior Professor, Department of Anaesthesia

Siddharth Sharma, SMS Medical College and Hospitals, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India

Associate Professor, Department of Anaesthesia

References

1. Apfelbaum JL, Chen C, Mehta SS, Gan TJ. Postoperative pain experience:
Results from a national survey suggest postoperative pain continues to be
undermanaged. Anesth Analg 2003;97:534-40.
2. Ho KM, Ismail H. Use of intrathecal midazolam to improve perioperative
analgesia: A meta-analysis. Anaesth Intensive Care 2008;36:365-73.
3. Morgan J, Mikhail M, Murray M, Larson J. Clinical Anesthesiology. 4th ed.
New York, USA: Lange; 2002.
4. Goodchild CS, Guo Z, Musgreave A, Gent JP. Antinociception by
intrathecal midazolam involves endogenous neurotransmitters acting at
spinal cord delta opioid receptors. Br J Anaesth 1996;77:758-63.
5. Chung CJ, Choi SR, Yeo KH, Park HS, Lee SI, Chin YJ. Hyperbaric spinal
ropivacaine for cesarean delivery: A comparison to hyperbaric bupivacaine.
Anesth Analg 2001;93:157-61.
6. Kim MH, Lee YM. Intrathecal midazolam increases the analgesic
effects of spinal blockade with bupivacaine in patients undergoing
haemorrhoidectomy. Br J Anaesth 2001;86:77-9.
7. Chattopadhyay A, Maitra S, Sen S, Bhattacharjee S, Layek A, Pal S,
Ghosh K. A study to compare the analgesic efficacy of intrathecal
bupivacaine alone with intrathecal bupivacaine midazolam combination in
patients undergoing elective infraumbilical surgery. Anesthesiol Res Pract
2013;2013:567134.
8. Talebi H, Yazdi B, Alizadeh S, Moshiry E, Nourozi A, Eghtesadi-Araghi P.
Effects of combination of intrathecal lidocaine and two doses of intrathecal
midazolam on post-operative pain in patients undergoing herniorrhaphy: A
randomized controlled trial. Pak J Biol Sci 2010;13:1156-60.
9. Gupta A, Kamat H, Kharod U. Efficacy of intrathecal midazolam in
potentiating the analgesic effect of intrathecal fentanyl in patients
undergoing lower limb surgery. Anesth Essays Res 2015;9:379-83.
10. Shah FR, Halbe AR, Panchal ID, Goodchild CS. Improvement in
postoperative pain relief by the addition of midazolam to an intrathecal
injection of buprenorphine and bupivacaine. Eur J Anaesthesiol
2003;20:904-10.
11. Usmani H, Quadir A, Siddiqi MM, Jamil SN. Intrathecal buprenorphinebupivacaine
versus intrathecal fentanyl-bupivacaine: An evaluation of
analgesic efficacy and common side effects. J Anaesthesiol 2003;19:183-6.
12. Agrawal N, Usmani A, Sehgal R, Kumar R, Bhadoria P. Effect of intrathecal
midazolam bupivacaine combination on postoperative analgesia. Indian J
Anaesth 2005;49:37-9.
13. Bharti N, Madan R, Mohanty PR, Kaul HL. Intrathecal midazolam added to
bupivacaine improves the duration and quality of spinal anaesthesia. Acta
Anaesthesiol Scand 2003;47:1101-5.
14. Khanna MS, Singh IK. Comparative evaluation of bupivacaine plain versus
bupivacaine with fentanyl in spinal anaesthesia in geriatric patients. Indian
J Anaesth 2002;46:199.
15. Tucker AP, Mezzatesta J, Nadeson R, Goodchild CS. Intrathecal midazolam
II: Combination with intrathecal fentanyl for labor pain. Anesth Analg
2004;98:1521-7.
16. Roussel JR, Heindel L. Effects of intrathecal fentanyl on duration of
bupivacaine spinal blockade for outpatient knee arthroscopy. AANA J
1999;67:337-43.
17. Bhattacharya D, Biswas B, Banerjee A. Intrathecal midazolam with
bupivacaine increases the analgesic effects of spinal blockade after lower
abdominal surgery. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol 2002;18:183-6.
18. Grewal P, Katyal S, Kaul TK, Narual N, Grewal A. A comparative study of
effects of fentanyl with different doses of bupivacine in subarachnoid block.
J Anaesth Clin Pharmacol 2003;19:193-7.
19. Shende D, Cooper GM, Bowden MI. The influence of intrathecal fentanyl
on the characteristics of subarachnoid block for caesarean section.
Anaesthesia 1998;53:706-10.
20. Ben-David B, Frankel R, Arzumonov T, Marchevsky Y, Volpin G. Minidose
bupivacaine-fentanyl spinal anesthesia for surgical repair of hip fracture in
the aged. Anesthesiology 2000;92:6-10.
21. Batra YK, Jain K, Chari P, Dhillon MS, Shaheen B, Reddy GM. Addition
of intrathecal midazolam to bupivacaine produces better post-operative
analgesia without prolonging recovery. Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther
1999;37:519-23.
22. Yun MJ, Kim YH, Kim JH, Kim KO, Oh AY, Park HP. Intrathecal midazolam
added to bupivacaine prolongs the duration of spinal blockade to T10
dermatome in orthopedic patients. Korean J Anesthesiol 2007;53:S22-8.
23. Martyr JW, Clark MX. Hypotension in elderly patients undergoing spinal
anaesthesia for repair of fractured neck of femur. A comparison of two
different spinal solutions. Anaesth Intensive Care 2001;29:501-5.
24. Rudra P, Rudra A. Comparison of intrathecal fentanyl and midazolam for
prevention of nausea-vomiting during caesarean delivery under spinal
anaesthesia. Indian J Anaesth 2004;48:461-4.
Published
2021-09-29