Hangman’s Fracture of the Cervical Spine: A Prospective Study

  • O R Jeff Walter Rajadurai Subam Clinic, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India
  • R J Oral Roberts Subam Clinic, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India
  • M Thangapandi Karpagam College of Pharmacy, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India
  • M Pooja Karpagam College of Pharmacy, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India
  • P K Sukanthi Karpagam College of Pharmacy, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India
Keywords: Fixation, Fracture, Fusion, Unstable

Abstract

Introduction: Hangman’s fracture is the second most common fracture of all the C2 vertebral fractures. It has been observed, which accounts for 55% of cervical fractures. They form 23–25% of (C2) axis fractures.
Materials and Methods: All Type II and IIa hangman’s fractures operated were included in this study. Twelve patients (eight men and four women) between 20 and 60 years of age diagnosed with unstable hangman’s fracture, treated, and followed up in our department were included in the study. Ten patients were injured in road traffic accidents, and two were injured due to falls from height.
Results: The total number of patients included in the study was 12, the age range from 20 to 60 years; male-to-female ratio is 8:4. All patients presented with neck pain. In Type II and IIa cases, the anterior approach was made in ten cases, where the reduction was achieved with traction. In anterior cases, the reduction was maintained after fixation.
Conclusion: The anterior approach with primary internal stabilization is the appropriate option for unstable Type II, Type IIa hangman’s fracture in cases was preoperative reduction that could be achieved. Using the anterior approach with the primary internal fixation of these fractures, solid fusion was achieved in all cases.

Author Biographies

O R Jeff Walter Rajadurai, Subam Clinic, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India

Consultant Orthopaedic Surgeon

R J Oral Roberts, Subam Clinic, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India

Consultant Orthopaedic Surgeon

M Thangapandi, Karpagam College of Pharmacy, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India

Pharm D 5th Year Post Graduate Student, Department of Pharmacy Practice

M Pooja, Karpagam College of Pharmacy, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India

Pharm D 4th Year Post Graduate Student, Department of Pharmacy Practice.

P K Sukanthi, Karpagam College of Pharmacy, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India

Pharm D 4th Year Post Graduate Student, Department of Pharmacy Practice

References

1. Termansen N. Hangman’s fracture. Acta Orthop Scand 1974;45:529-39.
2. Schneider R, Livingston K, Cave A, Hamilton G. Hangman’s fracture of the
cervical spine. J Neurosurg 1965;22:141-54.
3. Hadley M, Dickman C, Browner C, Sonntag V. Acute axis fractures: A
review of 229 cases. J Neurosurg 1989;71:642-7.
4. Ludwig S, Kramer D, Vaccaro A, Albert T. Transpedicle screw fixation of
the cervical spine. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1999;359:77-88.
5. Taller S, Suchomel P, Lukáš R, Beran J. CT-guided internal fixation of a
hangman’s fracture. Eur Spine J 2000;9:393-7.
6. Levine A, Edwards C. The management of traumatic spondylolisthesis of
the axis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1985;67:217-26.
7. Cornish B. Traumatic spondylolisthesis of the axis. J Bone Joint Surg Br
1968;50:31-43.
8. Li X, Dai L, Lu H, Chen X. A systematic review of the management of
hangman’s fractures. Eur Spine J 2005;15:257-69.
9. Samaha C, Lazennec J, Laporte C, Saillant G. Hangman’s fracture: The
relationship between asymmetry and instability. J Bone Joint Surg Br
2000;82:1046-52.
10. Boullosa J, Colli B, Carlotti C Jr., Tanaka K, Santos M. Surgical
management of axis’ traumatic spondylolisthesis (Hangman’s frature). Arq
Neuropsiquiatr 2004;62:821-6.
11. Verheggen R, Jansen J. Hangman’s fracture: Arguments in favor of surgical
therapy for Type II and III according to Edwards and Levine. Surg Neurol
1998;49:253-62.
12. Tuite G, Papadopoulos S, Sonntag V. Caspar plate fixation for the treatment
of complex hangman’s fractures. Neurosurgery 1992;30:761-4.
13. Müller E, Wick M, Muhr G. Traumatic spondylolisthesis of the axis:
Treatment rationale based on the stability of the different fracture types.
Eur Spine J 2000;9:123-8.
Published
2021-09-29