A Study of the Learning Approaches of Medical Students before and after Clinical Posting in a Medical College in South India

  • Suzanne Maria D’cruz Sri Muthukumaran Medical College Hospital and Research Institute, The Tamil Nadu Dr. M.G.R Medical University, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
  • Navin Rajaratnam Karpaga Vinayaga Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Centre, Maduranthagam, The Tamil Nadu Dr. M.G.R Medical University, Kanchipuram, Tamil Nadu, India
Keywords: Clinical posting, Learning approach, Medical students, Revised two-factor study process questionnaire

Abstract

troduction: Students use either a deep or a surface learning approach focusing on understanding or memorizing, respectively.
Learning approaches vary depending on the learning environment, curricula followed and year of study.
Aim: The aim of this study was to compare the learning approaches of medical students before and after they start their clinical
posting.
Materials and Methods: The revised two-factor study process questionnaire (R-SPQ-2F)was administered to 93 second-year
medical students of Sri Muthukumaran Medical College Hospital and Research Institute aged 19–20 years who were posted
in the Departments of General Medicine and Surgery before and after 3 months of their clinical posting. Deep and surface
learning approach main scores were determined.
Results: The majority (87.1%) of medical students in our study had a deep learning approach, and there was no change after
their clinical posting. There was no significant difference in the deep approach and surface approach main scores and subscale
scores before and after their clinical posting. The majority felt that studying was more satisfying (94%), interesting (92%), and
exciting (76%) and they felt like working harder (75%) and learning more deeply (82%) because they had seen patients. The
majority agreed that after seeing patients, they try to understand concepts (94%), relate new to previous knowledge (84%),
logically analyze information (86%), and study out of curiosity (91%) to master the subject (84%).
Conclusion: The majority of medical students had a deep approach to learning before starting their clinical posting and perceived
that seeing patients during their clinical posting had a positive effect on their learning, although no statistically significant
difference was found in learning approach scores.

Author Biographies

Suzanne Maria D’cruz, Sri Muthukumaran Medical College Hospital and Research Institute, The Tamil Nadu Dr. M.G.R Medical University, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India

Associate Professor, Department of Physiology, 

Navin Rajaratnam, Karpaga Vinayaga Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Centre, Maduranthagam, The Tamil Nadu Dr. M.G.R Medical University, Kanchipuram, Tamil Nadu, India

Professor, Department of Physiology,

References

1. Biggs JB, Kember D, Leung DYP. The revised two factor study process
questionnaire: R-SPQ-2F. Br J Educ Psychol 2001;71:133-49.
2. Serife AK. A conceptual analysis on the approaches to learning. Educ Sci
Theory Practice 2008;8:707-20.
3. Felder RM, Brent R. Understanding student differences. J Eng Educ
2005;94:57-72.
4. Newble DI, Gordon MI. The learning style of medical students. Med Educ
1985;19:3-8.
5. Wickramasinghe DP, Samarasekera DN. Factors influencing the approaches
to studying of preclinical and clinical students and postgraduate trainees.
BMC Med Educ 2011;11:22.
6. Reid WA, Evans P, Duvall E. Medical students’ approaches to learning over
a full degree programme. Med Educ Online 2012;17:17205.
7. Abraham RR, Vinod P, Kamath MG, Asha K, Ramnarayan K. Learning
approaches of undergraduate medical students to physiology in a non-PBLand partially PBL-oriented curriculum. Adv Physiol Educ 2008;32:35-7.
8. Mogre V, Amalba A. Approaches to learning among Ghanian students
following a PBL-based medical curriculum. Educ Med J 2015;7:e38-44.
9. Paudel KR, Nepal HP, Shrestha B, Panta R, Toth S. Distribution and
academic significance of learning approaches among pre-clinical medical
students at Trinity School of Medicine, St Vincent and the Grenadines.
J Educ Eval Health Prof 2018;15:9.
10. Sandover S, Jonas-Dwyer D, Marr T. Graduate entry and undergraduate
medical students’study approaches, stress levels and ways of coping: A five
year longitudinal study. BMC Med Educ 2015;15:5.
11. Chonkar SP, Ha TC, Chu SS, Ng AX, Lim ML, Ee TX, et al. The predominant
learning approaches of medical students. BMC Med Educ 2018;18:17.
12. May W, Chung EK, Elliott D, Fisher D. The relationship between medical
students’ learning approaches and performance on a summative high-stakes
clinical performance examination. Med Teach 2012;34:e236-41.
13. Medical Council of India (Homepage on the Internet). Vision; 2015.
Available from: https://www.old.mciindia.org/tools/announcement/MCI_
booklet.pdf. [Last accessed on 2018 Jan 08].
14. Biggs J. What do inventories of students’ learning processes really measure?
A theoretical review and clarification. Br J Educ Psychol 1993;63:3-19.
15. McDonald F, Reynolds J, Bixley A, Spronken-Smith R. Changes in
approaches to learning over three years of university undergraduate study.
Teach Learning Inq 2017;5:65-79.
16. Rajaratnam N, D’cruz SM, Chandrasekhar M. Correlation between the
learning approaches of first year medical students and their performance in
multiple choice questions in physiology. Natl J Integr Res Med 2013;4:43-8.
17. Rajaratnam N, Suganthi V, D’cruz SM. Correlation between the learning
approaches and perceived stress of first year medical students. S East Asian
J Case Rep Rev 2013;2:289-99.
18. Wilson K, Fowler J. Assessing the impact of learning environments on
students’ approaches to learning: Comparing conventional and action
learning designs. Assess Eval Higher Educ 2005;30:87-10.
19. Balasooriya CD, Hughes C, Toohey S. Impact of a new integrated medicine
program on students’ approaches to learning. Higher Educ Res Dev
2009;28:289-302.
Published
2018-06-15